Bringing you the world's best cafe racers, trackers, scramblers, bobbers & custom motorcycles.

1960 Ural M-52S – Motorworld

Posted on March 11, 2017 by Andrew in Classic, Racer. 20 comments

It’s the mid 1950s in Russia. As the country sunk deeper into its Cold War with the West, Soviet military minds began to realise that if push ever came to shove, they would probably need a replacement for their current army motorcycle, the Ural (or more correctly, the Irbit) M-72. Based on a brash reproduction of the BMW R71, its 20-year-old days were numbered. The replacement? Well, if pinching ideas from Deutschland worked once… So they acquired themselves an R51/3 and got to work removing the pork knuckle and adding a little beef stroganoff of their own. And then they took it racing. The result? Meet the Ural M-52S from Motorworld by V. Sheyanov.

In the early 1950s, the Central Design Bureau of Motorcycle Engineering (sounds like a real fun place to work) in Serpukhov received an official-looking brief from Moscow to carry out the design and research work to create a motorcycle with a boxer engine and a capacity of 500cc. A key part of their brief was the requirement to make the new bike as cross-compatible as possible with the outgoing M-72. The two motor works already manufacturing the M-72 – Irbit and Kiev – got to work.

In 1954, the first experimental M-52 with a motor designed by the Central Design Bureau was ready for testing. The features of its new top-hat engine are best described in the CDB report from the time, “The engine is largely based on the use of M-72 engine parts, for example, a series of crankcase was used with minor changes in the latest processing operations. The diameters of the crankshaft necks, piston pin and rollers with separators remain unified with the corresponding parts of the M-72 engine.” Clearly, Moscow was more interested in backward compatibility than spending their hard-earned Rubles on innovation. And with a looming space race on the horizon, could you blame them?

The pushrod valve train was borrowed directly from BMW’s R-51/3 road bike, but with typical Russian ingenuity the design was promptly improved on in various ways, including cylinders that were cast from an aluminum alloy with pressed cast-iron sleeves for the best of both metallurgical worlds.

Then in 1957, the party-sanctioned production of the sporty Ural ‘M-52S’, specifically designed for highway and circuit racing, began. It was based on the chassis of the latest racing M-77, but equipped with a specialised fork with a front axle from the M-52.

The power plant was a sporty modification of the garden-variety M-52. Testing at the time apparently showed it to be every bit the equal to the legendary BMW R37, which was considered one of the best racers in the post-war years.

The M-52S is easily identified by its valve cover sporting three longitudinal ribs. Internally, it also features a few go-faster tweaks including an increase in the compression ratio to 9.0:1 and two bigger, better carbs. All the hard work resulted in the engine saw power being increased to a whopping 35 hp.

And with this peak power being delivered at a healthy 6200 rpm, the bike could reportedly hit the magic ton. It’s interesting to note that in addition to the  technical modifications, this speed was also achieved by feeding the little beauty high-octane fuel. Sounds like a lot of effort for a 35hp racer, yeah? Boy, we’ve sure come a long way since then.

But the bike’s most attractive feature is probably its collectability. In the period from 1957 to 1961, a meagre 20 units were produced. And to add some nice vodka-flavoured icing onto the Ural M-52S cake, each and every example of the bike was assembled by hand. Speaking of hands, we’d like nothing more than to get our hands on one. Specifically in conjunction with a long stretch of deserted Russian highway and a few hours of spare time. See you there.

[Motorworld by V. Sheyanov – Facebook – Instagram]

  • Very nice!

  • A simple, tasteful post war design.

  • Guzzto

    What a beautiful motorcycle.

  • The trend to have no fenders is really shown up for what it really is here – a trend. Tell me those fenders don’t look cool AF…

    • guvnor67

      Cooler than an Artic winter!

      • I knew it.

        • guvnor67

          I think, that with the older bikes, especially say from the early 1900s through to the ’60s, when machines were constructed, or at least finished by hand, in metal, real leather, etc, everything served a purpose, a function, but had too look good, had to highlight that manufacturers skills, while keeping it affordable to the masses, and produce a product that they’d keep for decades. I’m only one person, but even with CAD etc, I actually believe It’s harder with modern vehicles, to achieve all of the above. Don’t get me wrong, a Supermoto or Tracker with a minimal ‘guard tucked up high under the headlight looks the ducks nuts, but park it next to a Brough, or Rocket Goldstar or a BSA M20, WL Harley, Indian Roadmaster ….

    • Fantome_NR

      Been saying this for years. I even got banned at Bike Exif for saying so! I was doing it nicely too…

      • the watcher

        Perhaps you didn’t say “only my opinion”, or “if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all”, or “looks like a hoot to ride” (or any of the other po-faced crap that passes for manners, but is really just a hideous fad), often enough to appease the ethically constipated “moderator”. Non-judgementalism is usually simple moral cowardice.

    • the watcher

      True, but the fact that it doesn’t have any LIGHTS does kinda detract from the “see, practical can be beautiful” argument.

    • John in Pollock

      The whole thing is cool AF

  • Paul Elliot

    Hey, my 2015 Ural Patrol with a 750CC engine and fuel injection makes only 40hp, so 35hp out of a 500 is not so bad.

  • guvnor67

    Beautiful bike! Simplicity and class.

  • It’s really telling when we post bikes like this. All the comments here? Positive and informative. All the comments on Facebook? Mindless comments on Communism and poor Russian quality. ‘It’s not reliable!’ they shout. So just like all other bikes from the late 1950s, then? Pffft.

    • guvnor67

      I haven’t had Facebook (FaceLESSbook), for 8 or 9 years, for the reason that, majority of the time, all we were seeing was negativety, and uninformed critisism. Pipeburn, and various owner forums, are the sun amongst the clouds, mostly visited by true enthusiasts, not long range snipers.

    • George

      Well, maybe deserved critics aren’t so bad? Here, in a land full of Urals and Dripros, we have a proverb “If it doesn’t leaks with oil, it doesn’t have oil” : )
      Bearing seals are really poor on these things, regardless of production year.

      And yes, I love Urals anyway. I even have one. And yes, it leaks.

  • Fantome_NR

    Lovely bike, and amazing to see a Ural without the usual sidecar appendage. There’s a cool motorcycle in there!

  • Don Arnold

    Always loved this color, same as the Park Service vehicles in the States. I’m going to paint an old Jeep this color someday.

  • Soapy Loofah

    Really wonderful job. Shiny in the just the right measure – doesn’t look over-finished. I assume the lack of lighting is due the racing heritage?

  • Iggy

    Why the second picture is the mirror copy of the first one ?